Today the first-to-file/first-to-disclose system is being
implemented which will basically de-emphasize the invention date. Many argue
that this will be an issue as patent trolls may have to opportunity to file
patent applications on inventions that have not yet been filed by small start
ups. However, according to this article an inventor can post their idea on a
site or blog and then still file that application within one year of public
disclosure. This is where the American patent filing system differentiates
itself from the rest of the world. In other countries, once an idea is
disclosed you cannot get a patent for that idea or invention.
In order to successfully adjust to this new system,
companies need to act quickly. Implementing a process to quickly identify
inventions is key. If a company does not have enough funding to file an actual
patent application, a carefully prepared provisional application should be
filed to ensure that the invention is disclosed in a legal way.
On the other hand, if it is decided that an invention is not worth immediately filing a patent application for, publicly disclosing the invention should prevent others from receiving patents on the same technology. But the decision to publicly disclose an invention before filing a patent application should not be taken lightly. Public disclosure prior to filing a patent application will likely cause foreign patent rights to be forfeited. In the case of software, which is not patentable in most foreign patent systems, this is not a problem. Therefore, disclosures for software-based inventions can be an ideal way to create prior art for others without the trade-off of forfeiting any patent rights that a company would otherwise be entitled to.
No comments:
Post a Comment